SDD CORE vs SDD B2B

The two SEPA Direct Debit variants — consumer-facing (8-week refund window) vs corporate (no refund).

SDD CORE and SDD B2B are the two SEPA Direct Debit schemes. They share the same pain.008 message envelope, but the rulebook around them is entirely different — the choice of variant cascades into lead-times, refund rights, and onboarding flow.

SDD CORE is the consumer-facing default. Refund rights are wide: 8 weeks for any authorised collection (no questions asked), extended to 13 months for an unauthorised collection. Lead-times are 5 banking days for the first collection (FRST) and 2 for subsequent ones (RCUR). The mandate can be paper-based or electronic; e-mandate flows are supported but not mandatory.

SDD B2B is the corporate-to-corporate scheme. Refund rights are zero — once the collection clears, it is final. To compensate, the debtor bank is required to confirm the mandate with the debtor *before* honouring the first collection (the "B2B mandate confirmation" step), and only an SCT-registered corporate entity can be the debtor. Lead-times are tighter at 1 banking day for both FRST and RCUR.

The pain.008 difference is the LclInstrm code: CORE vs B2B. iso-compliant validates that the (variant, debtor-type, lead-time) tuple is consistent at build time — emitting a B2B pain.008 with a consumer-tagged debtor is rejected before submission. See apps/api/src/lib/pain008-builder.ts.

A common cross-border surprise: SDD B2B requires the debtor to *opt in* with their bank to receive B2B direct debits at all (it is not on by default). A creditor who switches a recurring CORE mandate to B2B without coordinating with the debtor will see the first B2B collection reject as "debtor not enrolled in B2B".

Related terms

← All terms